- #Sandisk extreme pro cz88 128gb diskmark full#
- #Sandisk extreme pro cz88 128gb diskmark pro#
- #Sandisk extreme pro cz88 128gb diskmark iso#
Easy2Boot v1.89a Beta now available with Make_E2B.Please tick a Reactions box if you enjoyed this post. See also: my previous blog post on the Lexar P20 and why you shouldn't buy it! Personally, I did not feel it to be of particularly good quality, or very attractive or very tactile - so the metal case was not really a plus-point for me (sharp edges, paint scratched easily in pocket).
#Sandisk extreme pro cz88 128gb diskmark pro#
The drive shell casing of the Extreme Pro was slightly larger than the Extreme and was half-metal. The SanDisk Extreme 128GB may show slightly different timings to the SanDisk Extreme 64GB. Note: In this blog post, I have compared a SanDisk Extreme 64GB drive with a SanDisk Extreme 128GB Pro drive. There is no clear winner, the choice is yours. If booting from an E2B USB drive using Virtual Box, the Pro should be faster too.
#Sandisk extreme pro cz88 128gb diskmark full#
Running WindowsToGo will also be faster, as should full linux installations or linux+persistence. large VHDs or ISOs) the Extreme Pro will certainly take less time to copy them over than with the SanDisk Extreme. If you regularly copy lots of different files to your E2B drive under Windows (e.g. However, if you use E2B a lot and need to boot to the E2B menus as quickly as possible to run diagnostic software, etc., I would recommend the cheaper SanDisk Extreme. However, under grub4dos, BIOS access is much slower than the cheaper SanDisk Extreme. When booting to WinPE from an ISO, I noticed little difference (14 seconds for each).Ĭonclusion Under Windows, the Extreme Pro is certainly faster, both for large files and small files. I ran the E2B - Utilities - Measure BIOS USB Performance test on each drive on the IdeaPad 300 USB 3.0 port for 1000 cycles: The SanDisk Extreme 64GB was noticeably faster (probably twice as fast, though I did not time it because they did not have identical contents). I booted each flash drive to E2B on an IdeaPad 300 and a USB 3.0 port. I ran MAKE_E2B_USB_DRIVE (run as admin).cmd and timed it:
#Sandisk extreme pro cz88 128gb diskmark iso#
I extracted the 1000's of small files from a XP Pro SP3 ISO onto each drive using 7Zip. I copied 3 large files from my internal SSD to each USB drive (using Xcopy from the command line) and calculated the transfer rates: The results were similar (but they did vary a fair bit when repeated). The Crystal DiskMark results are shown below: This indicates that the USB controller always does a read-erase-write cycle on every write (so not an SSD controller). However, there was no difference between benchmarks after I had filled it with junk data and then re-formatted it. This ensured that the flash controller had to perform a read-erase-write cycle on every write when running any further tests. I tested the Pro using Crystal DiskMark and then filled to entire drive with junk data and then repeated the test. I have now run a few tests on it and compared it directly with the SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB flash drive. Hurray! My new SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB flash drive just came this morning.
0 kommentar(er)
